Where Would I Be Without Freedom Essays - My Freedom,

Where Would I Be Without Freedom? Where Would I Be Without Freedom? I walk upon the earth and marvel at the ability to let the grass cushion my wandering feet. What if my feet could not wander? What if I were a slave to this rich soil, then where would I be? Society may not be controlled, and it may wander aimlessly perhaps, but it wanders on its own course. I walk with society and against it, and I have the freedom to do this. I would not be able to write such an essay if I didn't have my freedom. It is this freedom that allows me to write an essay differently from other people and is what has taken many others and me as far along in our journey. Freedom is the grass that cushions my step, the softness that allows me to tread anywhere without the fear of persecution. Without this layer of protection I would not want to stray far from what I know. Without protection from the corrupt world, I would remain the same immature child who could not walk far from what I could not see. Light liberates darkness the same as freedom liberates slaves. Darkness is the absence of light just as slavery is merely the absence of freedom. Without the light of this freedom I would be in the shadow of darkness; confined to the barren ignorant lands that light never reaches. Grass ceases to grow and life as I know it would be useless ? dead. The fire that burns within the soul is fueled by the sun, fueled by the liberation and freedom which allows us to fill ourselves with worldly and unworldly beliefs. There is little faith behind a society who does not have the ability to choose its own unworldly beliefs. Being spoon-fed from birth by my Orthodox Baptist parents, I rode my own spirit into the arms of God and the ways of Christianity. Faith may guide many a man and his heart, but freedom guides the soul. No one knows the truth concerning God, religion, or existence, but the freedom to seek the truth like I have has made me whole. Without freedom I would still place myself higher than everything else and perceive myself as my own master. This provincial nature that the world commercializes I once held, but it has been freed by the disuniting of my flesh and its influence upon my mind, soul, and heart. Freedom is too immense a concept to comprehend yet too narrow a word to define, but it drives me. Without it I become dark and meek as I look to the cold earth for heavenly answers. Freedom is there for anyone even slaves. The light needs but to be turned on and ignorance can do nothing but flee.

Free Essays on Critical Review

Critical review of an article from The Guardian 18th December 2003 The article I’m reviewing comes from The Guardian 18th December 2003. Headed â€Å"Chirac calls on MP’s to ban headscarves†. A journalist called Paul Webster wrote this article. Briefly this piece is explaining the situation in France regarding President Chirac wanting to ban headscarves and other â€Å"conspicuous† religious signs from state schools. The tone of the article appears to be factual. It does, however seem to be a biased article in favour of the ban. There isn’t much criticism of the President and his decision for legislation regarding this. The French Council of the Muslim Faith is said to have called this a â€Å"disastrous† decision. Although the article says that the President is calling for legislation regarding headscarves and other â€Å"conspicuous† religious signs the focus of this piece is mainly the headscarves issue. There is an opinion poll mentioned, taken the previous day but it doesn’t actually state where this poll was taken or the cross section of people/religious backgrounds polled. The writer states this poll gave a result of 69% in favour of President Chirac’s decision regarding headscarves and religious signs in schools and public services and â€Å"opposed the introduction of public holidays to celebrate Muslim and Jewish feasts†. Paul then goes on to say that two thirds of the leftwing and National Front (rightwing) voters approved, as did 75% of the centre-right. This proposal is documented as â€Å"the most popular reform the President has sponsored since he was first elected in 1995†. â€Å"Discreet signs† of religious affiliation would be allowed, signs such as the hand of Fatima, the star of David, and the cross depending on the size – which would be determined by parliament. The writer then goes on to speak about President Chirac’s 35-minute address to an â€Å"invited audience† – presumably invited ... Free Essays on Critical Review Free Essays on Critical Review Critical review of an article from The Guardian 18th December 2003 The article I’m reviewing comes from The Guardian 18th December 2003. Headed â€Å"Chirac calls on MP’s to ban headscarves†. A journalist called Paul Webster wrote this article. Briefly this piece is explaining the situation in France regarding President Chirac wanting to ban headscarves and other â€Å"conspicuous† religious signs from state schools. The tone of the article appears to be factual. It does, however seem to be a biased article in favour of the ban. There isn’t much criticism of the President and his decision for legislation regarding this. The French Council of the Muslim Faith is said to have called this a â€Å"disastrous† decision. Although the article says that the President is calling for legislation regarding headscarves and other â€Å"conspicuous† religious signs the focus of this piece is mainly the headscarves issue. There is an opinion poll mentioned, taken the previous day but it doesn’t actually state where this poll was taken or the cross section of people/religious backgrounds polled. The writer states this poll gave a result of 69% in favour of President Chirac’s decision regarding headscarves and religious signs in schools and public services and â€Å"opposed the introduction of public holidays to celebrate Muslim and Jewish feasts†. Paul then goes on to say that two thirds of the leftwing and National Front (rightwing) voters approved, as did 75% of the centre-right. This proposal is documented as â€Å"the most popular reform the President has sponsored since he was first elected in 1995†. â€Å"Discreet signs† of religious affiliation would be allowed, signs such as the hand of Fatima, the star of David, and the cross depending on the size – which would be determined by parliament. The writer then goes on to speak about President Chirac’s 35-minute address to an â€Å"invited audience† – presumably invited ...